Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Oliver Jowett" <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-02 22:13:17
Message-ID: BB05A27C22288540A3A3E8F3749B45AB32C0DD@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Jowett [mailto:oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:06 PM
> To: Chuck McDevitt
> Cc: Tom Lane; andrew(at)supernews(dot)com; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1
>
> Chuck McDevitt wrote:
>
> > Why not just use SO_KEEPALIVE on the TCP socket?
>
> We already do, but the default keepalive interval makes it next to
useless.
>
> -O

So, change the default. On Linux it's in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time

Admittedly, this isn't a great solution, but it had the advantage of
being simple.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-02 23:22:20 Heads up: impending 8.0, 7.4, 7.3 releases
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2005-05-02 22:05:56 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1