Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Donate
Your account
Quick Links
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
IRC
Local User Groups
Events
International Sites
Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
From:
"Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To:
"Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc:
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
Date:
2005-11-23 00:46:01
Message-ID:
BB05A27C22288540A3A3E8F3749B45AB025F3740@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com
Views:
Raw Message
|
Whole Thread
|
Download mbox
|
Resend email
Thread:
2005-11-23 00:46:01 from "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
2005-11-23 03:36:27 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2005-11-23 04:04:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to
use it.
Responses
Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to
at 2005-11-23 03:36:27 from Joshua D. Drake
Browse pgsql-hackers by date
From
Date
Subject
Next Message
mark
2005-11-23 00:51:04
Re: Improving count(*)
Previous Message
Alvaro Herrera
2005-11-23 00:41:14
Re: tablespaces and non-empty directories