Re: Buglist

Bruno Wolff III wote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:17:41 +0530,
> Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> >
> > Idea of autovacuum is to reduce load on vacuum full. If you set
shared_buffers
> > higher and FSM properly for he update/delete load, autovacuum is
expected to
> > catch most of the dead tuples in shared cache only. If it is successful
in
> > doubling the frequency on vacuum full, that's a big win, isn't it?
>
> If you run a normal vacuum often enough, you shouldn't need to regularly
> run vacuum full.

Hmm, here we have a certain table, sort of FIFO, rows get inserted all the
time, lay there for a couple of hours and get deleted "the other end
around". We run normal vacuum almost constantly, but the table keeps
growing. We had to implement a 'vacuum full' once a week to keep it under
control.

cl.