Re: proposal for 8.3: Simultaneous assignment for PL/pgSQL

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Subject: Re: proposal for 8.3: Simultaneous assignment for PL/pgSQL
Date: 2006-08-07 13:29:23
Message-ID: BAY20-F255534E7F6F599B584B490F9570@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > a,b,c := out3fce(1); -- Simultaneous assignment
>
>I thought we rejected that idea once already, on the grounds that it
>would make it too hard to tell the difference between intended code
>and typos.
>

Yes, because wasn't procedures with out params, my arguments wasn't strong.
Older patch was too liberal. I can test equal type compatibility, count of
variables and fileds in record compatibility.

Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-07 13:48:14 Simplifying "standby mode"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-07 13:09:37 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2