From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 |
Date: | 2007-03-10 21:38:01 |
Message-ID: | BAY20-F1982E446AFFC2C1D19498BF97F0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>Specifically I think you need to study this patch:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-01/msg00370.php
>
>But isn't back-porting plpgpsm to old releases a waste of development
>and maintenance effort anyway?
>
I unlike it and last weak I play with it. But I don't expect so Debian and
RH will be support 8.3 soon. And I would to help to expansion plpgpsm. When
I comment FreeExecutorState, runtime works well (with some minor problems -
domains). With 8.1 support I will have much bigger group of users, testers
(I hope).
I have to study your patch.
Thank you
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Najdete si svou lasku a nove pratele na Match.com. http://www.msn.cz/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-10 22:10:51 | Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-10 21:06:16 | Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1 |