From: | "Luis Silva" <lfs12(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bruno(at)wolff(dot)to |
Cc: | mike(at)fuhr(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: check problem |
Date: | 2006-02-24 10:09:29 |
Message-ID: | BAY18-F3354D4C91484CDBB7AB81B5F30@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
is it possible to make a trigger that could evaluate all identities and
search for the implicit_group that we want to insert and match with that
private. if false return an error.
>From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
>To: Luis Silva <lfs12(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>CC: mike(at)fuhr(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Subject: Re: [NOVICE] check problem
>Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:52:32 -0600
>
>On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 23:52:31 +0000,
> Luis Silva <lfs12(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > tks for answering.
> > Identity is the private key from the table. using your examples you
>could
> > have :
> > 1) ident1,1,'aaaa'
> > 2) ident2,1,'aaaa'
> > 3) ident3,2,'aaaa'
> > 4) ident4,3,'bbbb'
> >
> > but not
> >
> > 5)identi5,1,'bbbb'
> >
> > -->same implicit_group for different privates.
> > is it possible? tks again
>
>The above table should only have the ident and the group number. The group
>number should have a foreign key reference to another table of which the
>group number is the primary key and another column for private.
>This will allow only one private for each group number.
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-02-24 10:24:43 | Re: View running Processes ? |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2006-02-24 10:05:17 | Re: View running Processes ? |