FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL

From: Luke Porter <luke_porter(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-02-01 15:42:36
Message-ID: BAY140-W403C9EE2C3E2B7DD28EC1889300@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


All

Is there an interest in developing bitemporal functionality in PostgreSQL

Regards

Luke > From: bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> Subject: Re: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL> To: luke_porter(at)hotmail(dot)com> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:08:03 -0500> > Luke Porter wrote:> > > > Bruce> > > > I have a compelling solution to provide a database with bitemporal> > functionality. It is a comprehensive spec. Is there any interest> > in PostgreSQL providing this functionality. The area is sometimes> > referred to as "temporal agility". It has recently been covered> > as an emerging requirement by Garther and C J Date has recently> > lectured on the area (My solution was demo'd at the same event> > he spoke at). It is a transforming approach to data management> > in that it completely removes the need for the developer to> > address the time dimension - the database does it all.> > Yes, I think there would be interest. I would ask on the hackers email> list.> > --> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us> EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com> > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
_________________________________________________________________
Telly addicts unite!
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/tvtown.shtml

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-02-01 15:47:34 Re: Limit changes query plan
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2008-02-01 15:18:00 Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target