From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql |
Date: | 2006-10-04 21:54:21 |
Message-ID: | BAY114-F22062B05F2F04224DFEC34F91D0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I miss some info in context: function's oid, function's argumenst and
> > schema. Maybe:
>
> > 199292 function public.foo(int, int, int) language plpgsql statement
>return
> > line 10
>
>Putting the OID there is a seriously awful idea, not least because it
>would make it impossible to have stable regression-test outputs.
>
>I'm not really convinced that we need more than the function name.
>
> regards, tom lane
it's strong argument, but it's true. I didn't think about it. Without fid I
am not able identify function.
regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Chcete sdilet sve obrazky a hudbu s prateli? http://messenger.msn.cz/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Singer | 2006-10-04 22:02:06 | Re: 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-10-04 21:46:18 | Re: Netflix Prize data |