Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql
Date: 2006-10-04 21:54:21
Message-ID: BAY114-F22062B05F2F04224DFEC34F91D0@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I miss some info in context: function's oid, function's argumenst and
> > schema. Maybe:
>
> > 199292 function public.foo(int, int, int) language plpgsql statement
>return
> > line 10
>
>Putting the OID there is a seriously awful idea, not least because it
>would make it impossible to have stable regression-test outputs.
>
>I'm not really convinced that we need more than the function name.
>
> regards, tom lane

it's strong argument, but it's true. I didn't think about it. Without fid I
am not able identify function.

regards
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Chcete sdilet sve obrazky a hudbu s prateli? http://messenger.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2006-10-04 22:02:06 Re: 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-10-04 21:46:18 Re: Netflix Prize data