From: | Dean Rasheed <dean_rasheed(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Auto-explain patch |
Date: | 2008-01-28 19:55:53 |
Message-ID: | BAY113-W342DE8A62B65BFAF399124F2340@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Dean,
>
> Maybe I missed something obvious here, but how does this patch handle
> the situation where people have turned on INTEGER_DATETIMES?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
> --
> David Fetter http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Sorry, I don't understand. I am new to this code, but I can't see how the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag will affect this code. I am using the macros and functions from instrument.h and explain.c for timing, which appear to use gettimeofday() or QueryPerformanceCounter(), coverting the result to a double to report the total time spent running the query.
As far as I can see, the INTEGER_DATETIMES flag doesn't affect this code. Am I missing something?
Dean.
_________________________________________________________________
Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox.
http://www.searchgamesbox.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-01-28 20:08:00 | Re: Auto-explain patch |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-01-28 19:55:22 | Re: [PATCHES] Friendly help for psql |