Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU

From: MC Moisei <mcmoisei(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU
Date: 2007-06-08 21:11:10
Message-ID: BAY103-W2306DF7F16130B077ABB84D5250@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I did that remotely, thru the psqladmin. How do I do it from that box ?> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:41:57 -0400> From: esconsult1(at)gmail(dot)com> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postmaster processes taking all the CPU> CC: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> > Have you done a full vacuum and not just a reqular vacuum?> > - Ericson Smith> Developer> http://www.funadvice.com> > On 6/8/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:20:28PM -0500, MC Moisei wrote:> > >> > > pack of postmaster(4-22) processes ran by postgres user are taking> > > over almost all the CPU.> >> > What else is the box doing? If it doesn't have any other work to do,> > why shouldn't postgres use the CPU time? (This is a way of saying,> > "You didn't tell us anything that would allow us to help.")> >> > A> >> > --> > Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> > In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-> > garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.> > --Brad Holland> >> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------> > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?> >> > http://archives.postgresql.org/> >> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ericson Smith 2007-06-08 21:11:44 Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU
Previous Message MC Moisei 2007-06-08 20:58:40 Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU