From: | carter ck <carterck32(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improve Search |
Date: | 2007-11-02 08:33:29 |
Message-ID: | BAY101-W3C08586D537EE388F7655D58D0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hm. No. I am not using tsearch2. I have looked at the documentation, but not sure how it benefits me.
I am searching for text such as mobile numbers and user name in my application.
Any idea of having tseach2 to accommodate different search fields? Way of Implementing it will be helpful too.
Thanks.
----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 22:32:47 -0500
> From: scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com
> To: carterck32(at)hotmail(dot)com
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Improve Search
> CC: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
> On 11/1/07, carter ck wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone come across a solution for faster and powerful search stored procedure in a table that contains more than 500K of records?
>>
>> I am currently trying to work around with it. All helps are appreciated.
>
> Are you using the tsearch2 full text engine? If not, you're missing
> the boat for fast searching text. But you didn't really tell us what
> exactly you're searching on, so I'm just guessing.
_________________________________________________________________
Manage multiple email accounts with Windows Live Mail!
http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Moiz Kothari | 2007-11-02 08:48:01 | Re: Number to Words Conversion |
Previous Message | Yogesh Arora | 2007-11-02 08:31:27 | Re: Number to Words Conversion |