From: | "Sally Sally" <dedeb17(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: primary key and existing unique fields |
Date: | 2004-10-28 14:31:32 |
Message-ID: | BAY101-F12z1enAqpfk0000ecb7@hotmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dawid,
I am interested in the first point you made that:
having varchar(12) in every referencing table, takes more storage
space.
The thing is though, if I have a serial primary key then it would be an
additional column. Or you are saying the space taken by a VARCHAR(12) field
is more than two INT fields? ( or is it the fact that when it is referenced
it will appear several times?) I guess the reason I am resisting the idea of
an additional primary key field is to avoid the additional lookup in some
queries. Perhaps it's a minor almost irrelevant performance factor.
Thanks
Sally
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marco Colombo | 2004-10-28 14:32:34 | Re: Reasoning behind process instead of thread based |
Previous Message | MaRCeLO PeReiRA | 2004-10-28 14:25:30 | Re: Tables and Indexes |