From: | "MikeSmialek2(at)Hotmail(dot)com" <mikesmialek2(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin |
Date: | 2004-10-14 17:01:38 |
Message-ID: | BAY10-DAV143SOlbpH7000236a9@hotmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-performance |
Hi,
We are experiencing slow performance on 8 Beta 2 Dev3 on Win32 and are
trying to determine why. Any info is appreciated.
We have a Web Server and a DB server both running Win2KServer with all
service packs and critical updates.
An ASP page on the Web Server hits the DB Server with a simple query that
returns 205 rows and makes the ASP page delivered to the user about 350K.
On an ethernet lan a client pc perceives just under 1 sec performance with
the following DB Server configuration:
PIII 550Mhz
256MB RAM
7200 RPM HD
cygwin
Postgresql 7.1.3
PGODBC 7.3.2
We set up another DB Server with 8 beta (same Web Server, same network, same
client pc) and now the client pc perceives response of just over 3 sec with
the following DB server config:
PIII 700 Mhz
448MB RAM
7200 RPM HD
8 Beta 2 Dev3 on Win32 running as a service
Is the speed decrease because it's a beta?
Is the speed decrease because it's running on Win instead of cygwin?
We did not install cygwin on the new DB Server.
Thanks,
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steven Klassen | 2004-10-14 17:07:39 | Re: Verifying a user. |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-10-14 16:56:10 | Re: Verifying a user. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-10-14 17:29:25 | Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin |
Previous Message | Albi Rebmann | 2004-10-14 12:25:38 | Re: postgres win32 in FAT32 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-10-14 17:29:25 | Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-10-14 04:29:19 | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some |