Re: Max registers in postgresql 7.4

OK boys, i've made a mistake by using the term "register". What i meant is
"record".
Could you please tell me if there's a limit in the amount of records that
the database can handle?
Thanks... Ruby
Martin: why do you say i meant tuple?

>From: Martin Marques <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
>To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
>CC: Ruby Deepdelver <janettedoe(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Max registers in postgresql 7.4
>Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:44 -0300
>
>Mensaje citado por Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>:
>
> > "Ruby Deepdelver" <janettedoe(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> >
> > > Hello, I'm having trouble in find certain information, i've search
> > > over the web and through the documentation but i haven't had lucky.
> > > I need to know if there is some limit in the amount of registers that
> > > the database can manage, and if so, how much is that maximun.
> >
> > Ummm... What is a 'register'? That's not a standard database term
> > AFAIK and it does not have any meaning with respect to PostgreSQL.
> > That's probably why you couldn't find anything. :)
>
>Doug, you forgot to say what the term really is: TUPLE
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus