Re: MySQL 5 comparison

From: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL 5 comparison
Date: 2005-01-06 14:17:41
Message-ID: BAY0-SMTP024F6C7DD85F8A2D3C8CA4D6930@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Merlin Moncure wrote:

> Putting my advocacy hat on,
> If you look at their description of the upcoming features, it's
> saturated with words like 'basic', 'initial', and 'rudimentary'. I
> don't think mysql 5.0 will be a watershed moment where it will become
> the database of choice for industrial application development...

That reminds me of another, related question ... can anyone comment on the relationship between MySQL 5 and MaxDB (formerly SAP DB)? The talk at one point was that the end result of that alliance would be a total rewrite of MySQL to incorporate concepts from MaxDB, and that the new product would somehow be backward compatible with both predecessors.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-01-06 14:40:05 Re: MySQL 5 comparison
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2005-01-06 14:11:06 Re: MySQL 5 comparison