Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date: 2011-06-19 16:00:29
Message-ID: BANLkTinu4_2fgfNih+2FMV65kRBy0FEHLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I took another look at this this evening, and realised that my
comments could be a little clearer.

Attached revision cleans them up a bit.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
new_latch.v4.patch text/x-patch 24.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-06-19 16:13:34 Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2011-06-19 15:59:23 Re: patch: Allow \dd to show constraint comments