Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)

From: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)
Date: 2011-06-17 07:54:06
Message-ID: BANLkTinn4ze=naj49pfG_fGbLwsQUpynQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/6/10 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2011/6/9 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> BTW, as I changed title and design from the previous post, should I
>>> throw away the old commit fest entry and make the new one?
>>
>> Nah, just edit the existing entry and change the title.
>>
>> Also add a link to the new patch, of course.
>
> Ok, done.

While reviewing the gist/box patch, I found some planner APIs that can
replace parts in my patch. Also, comments in includes wasn't updated
appropriately. Revised patch attached.

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada

Attachment Content-Type Size
aggjoin-20110617.patch application/octet-stream 25.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru Hanada 2011-06-17 07:57:28 Re: deadlock_timeout at < PGC_SIGHUP?
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2011-06-17 06:29:58 Re: Another swing at JSON