Re: Contrib Versions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Contrib Versions
Date: 2011-05-12 22:51:06
Message-ID: BANLkTinjJWYMqHXfiZo=vUsJ4KvcaSQYCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:33 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> Having said that, I don't really care that much, except that it seems
>> a bit late in the release cycle to be changing this.  People have
>> presumably already got installations that they hope to not have to
>> scratch and reload for 9.1 final.
>
> Would changing the versions from 1.0 to 1.0.0 really break anything for those folks?

Yes.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-12 22:53:56 Re: 'tuple concurrently updated' error for alter role ... set
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-12 22:50:59 Re: Contrib Versions