From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Contrib Versions |
Date: | 2011-05-12 22:51:06 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTinjJWYMqHXfiZo=vUsJ4KvcaSQYCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:33 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> Having said that, I don't really care that much, except that it seems
>> a bit late in the release cycle to be changing this. People have
>> presumably already got installations that they hope to not have to
>> scratch and reload for 9.1 final.
>
> Would changing the versions from 1.0 to 1.0.0 really break anything for those folks?
Yes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-12 22:53:56 | Re: 'tuple concurrently updated' error for alter role ... set |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-05-12 22:50:59 | Re: Contrib Versions |