From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alex Ferrara <alex(at)receptiveit(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: Failed assert ((data - start) == data_size) in heaptuple.c |
Date: | 2011-04-07 07:07:55 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTiniZHzTAJz4bcxTfV0z=1FsNHjmyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 7 April 2011 16:56, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((data - start) == data_size)", File:
>> "heaptuple.c", Line: 255)
>
> [ scratches head ... ] That implies that heap_fill_tuple came to a
> different conclusion about a tuple's data size than the immediately
> preceding heap_compute_data_size. Which I would sure want to believe
> is impossible. Have you checked for flaky memory on this machine?
>
We are doing so now -- although the RAM is ECC and just a few months
old, so flakiness seems a distant possibility. I will report back
after we've given it a proper thrashing with memtest.
Cheers,
BJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Savita | 2011-04-07 07:38:49 | BUG #5967: Db maintainace |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-07 06:56:34 | Re: Failed assert ((data - start) == data_size) in heaptuple.c |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-07 07:08:18 | Re: too many dotted names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-07 06:56:34 | Re: Failed assert ((data - start) == data_size) in heaptuple.c |