Re: pg_listener in 9.0

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_listener in 9.0
Date: 2011-06-01 12:29:57
Message-ID: BANLkTingGgumxMLuORxN3qXnh8uEW_zpgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> The whole point of the revamp was that pg_listener was a major performance
> bottleneck and needed to go, and without it being gone we would not have got
> notification payloads.

Yeah, I know why it was replaced. That doesn't mean we cannot provide
an alternative interface to the same info though (other things might
of course).

> I suspect you're pretty much out of luck.

Not me - our users.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2011-06-01 12:38:08 Re: Cube Index Size
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-06-01 12:27:48 Re: pg_listener in 9.0