| From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
| Date: | 2011-04-19 03:15:18 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinZuT2Y3QUaQuO_0g_pbhTwfozBRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 19:50, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> You'll notice that this has been a complaint of veteran contributors as
> well; WIP patches either get no review, or get reviewed as if they were
> expected to be committable.
I don't see this changing anytime in the future. We have a hard enough
time getting "finished" patches reviewed.
> The person who e-mailed me suggests some form of PostgreSQL Incubator as
> a solution. I'm not sure about that, but it does seem to me that we
> need somewhere or some way that people can submit patches, ideas, git
> forks, etc., for discussion without that discussion needing to
> immediately move to the cleanliness/maintainability/supportable status
> of the patch.
Reminds me a bit of what linux is doing with the "staging" tree. I
don't see anyway for that to work with postgres (lower the bar for
-contrib?).
You can fork fairly easy with github nowdays. For example the replace
GEQ with SA is on one of those git sites. Does that mean it gets any
attention? *shrug*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-19 03:41:17 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-04-19 01:52:31 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |