| From: | Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 |
| Date: | 2011-04-21 08:02:07 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinR7W5atkCuhLpvPDUpJh=b5vvc3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 09:01 AM, Laurent Laborde wrote:
>
>> A review of the V+100 on the excellent anandtech :
>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/4010/kingston-ssdnow-v-plus-100-review
>
> That's horrifying. 4.9MB/s random writes? 19.7MB/s random reads? That's at
> least an order of magnitude lower than other SSDs of that generation. I
> can't imagine that would be very good for database usage patterns by
> comparison. Especially with that aggressive garbage collection.
>
> I mean... an old Indilinx OCZ Vertex has better performance than that
We just orderer 2 Corsair C300 240GB to compare performance and see if
the difference is as huge as claimed on anandtech's benchmark :)
--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tory M Blue | 2011-04-21 08:28:45 | oom_killer |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2011-04-21 07:34:47 | Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? |