Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1

From: Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
Date: 2011-04-21 08:02:07
Message-ID: BANLkTinR7W5atkCuhLpvPDUpJh=b5vvc3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 09:01 AM, Laurent Laborde wrote:
>
>> A review of the V+100 on the excellent anandtech :
>> http://www.anandtech.com/show/4010/kingston-ssdnow-v-plus-100-review
>
> That's horrifying. 4.9MB/s random writes? 19.7MB/s random reads? That's at
> least an order of magnitude lower than other SSDs of that generation. I
> can't imagine that would be very good for database usage patterns by
> comparison. Especially with that aggressive garbage collection.
>
> I mean... an old Indilinx OCZ Vertex has better performance than that

We just orderer 2 Corsair C300 240GB to compare performance and see if
the difference is as huge as claimed on anandtech's benchmark :)

--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tory M Blue 2011-04-21 08:28:45 oom_killer
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2011-04-21 07:34:47 Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?