| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
| Date: | 2011-06-08 16:43:08 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinPVSen=kprr1Pq7xA5fAcvhiAtCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> One more thing --- when Tom applied that patch during 8.3 beta it was
> with everyone's agreement, so the policy should be that if we are going
> to break the rules, everyone has to agree --- if anyone disagrees, the
> rules stand.
I spoke against applying the patch, and to my knowledge was the only
person to have reviewed it at that stage.
I was happy that Tom applied it, but I would not have done so myself
then, nor would I do so now. I would trust only Tom to do that, which
is why I proposed to Tom that he look at Robert's patch.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2011-06-08 16:44:37 | Re: Error in PQsetvalue |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-06-08 16:40:06 | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |