| From: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |
| Date: | 2011-04-07 01:07:02 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinOw9WSM-pq4h-HRJO9uy9MM1SwOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/5/11 7:07 AM, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>One thing about MLC flash drives (which the industry seems to be
>>moving towards) is that you have to factor drive lifespan into the
>>total system balance of costs. Data point: had an ocz vertex 2 that
>>burned out in ~ 18 months. In the post mortem, it was determined that
>>the drive met and exceeded its 10k write limit -- this was a busy
>>production box.
>
> What OCZ Drive? What controller? Indilinx? SandForce? Wear-leveling on
> these vary quite a bit.
SandForce SF-1200
-Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-04-07 01:32:27 | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |
| Previous Message | Scott Carey | 2011-04-07 00:42:17 | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |