Re: pg_basebackup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Emanuel Calvo <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup
Date: 2011-06-03 16:09:01
Message-ID: BANLkTinKW+586_46XyH21UUgcrtaTpbmDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Emanuel Calvo <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing the results of pg_basebackup and I saw postmaster.opts.
> Is not necessary, although is inoffensive. But has  the name of the
> original cluster name inside. If it's only keep for information purposes,
> maybe backup_label could be the right place.
>
> Is just an idea.
>
> Thougths?

I think we're just copying all the files we find. We could add an
exception specifically for that case, but I'm not sure whether that's
a good idea or not.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radosław Smogura 2011-06-03 16:09:48 Re: BLOB support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-03 16:08:56 Re: BLOB support