Re: - GSoC - snapshot materialized view (work-in-progress) patch

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Baroš <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: - GSoC - snapshot materialized view (work-in-progress) patch
Date: 2011-06-17 18:31:00
Message-ID: BANLkTinHXgfPRFjeT=6yneAdPpTSLORL1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/7/12 Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>:
> Pavel Baroš<baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz> wrote:
>> Dne 9.7.2010 21:33, Robert Haas napsal(a):
>
>>> Please add your patch here, so that it will be reviewed during
>>> the about-to-begin CommitFest.
>>>
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>>>
>>
>> OK, but will you help me with that form? Do you think I can fill
>> it like that? I'm not sure about few fields ..
>>
>> Name:             Snapshot materialized views
>> CommitFest Topic: [ Miscellaneous | SQL Features ] ???
>
> SQL Features seems reasonable to me.
>
>> Patch Status:     Needs review
>> Author:           me
>> Reviewers:        You?
>
> Leave empty.  Reviewers will sign up or be assigned.
>
>> Commiters:        who?
>
> That comes much later -- when the patch is complete and has a
> favorable review, then a committer will pick it up.
>
>> and I quess fields 'Date Closed' and 'Message-ID for Original
>> Patch' will be filled later.
>
> Date closed is only set for patches which are committed, returned
> with feedback (for a later CommitFest), or rejected.  When you make
> an entry which references a post to the lists, you should fill in
> the Message-ID from the email header of the post.  You may be able
> to get this from your email software as soon as you send the post;
> if not, you can find it on the archive page for the post.

This topic hasn't been touched on in nearly a year, but is the work
that's been done so far salvageable? I'm not sure what happens to
GSoC project work that doesn't get finished in time.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-17 18:40:04 Re: [HACKERS] Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-17 18:24:09 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe