Re: potential bug in trigger with boolean params

From: Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: potential bug in trigger with boolean params
Date: 2011-05-11 10:20:25
Message-ID: BANLkTinH8VhV=0BVN6CJa-rxj1c67jeHTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 May 2011 12:06, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>
> Why do you wan't to use a boolean directly if you can't use it as the type
> itself anyway?
>
>
Yep, and this is a really good point :)
I wanted to have consistent api, so use true when I have a boolean value.
I will use 'true' and add some info on that to the procedure documentation.

regards
Szymon

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-05-11 10:34:58 Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-05-11 10:09:32 Re: the big picture for index-only scans