From: | Gábor Farkas <gabor(at)nekomancer(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | autovacuum ignores some tables |
Date: | 2011-06-23 07:20:20 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTinCncZM5MoKxhCUF6jyNy2Mvs+3hA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
hi,
postgresql8.4.7 here.
i checked the pg_stat_user_tables table, and it have a lot of rows
there where the "last_autovacuum" and/or "last_autoanalyze" are null.
does this mean that autovacuum never worked on those tables?
roughly 70% of all the tables have null in those fields..
in those never-autovacuumed tables there are tables that are quite
big, and also have a lot of activity, so it's not that they never
needed vacuuming...
i wonder why autovacuum ignored them. i checked my settings with "SHOW
ALL" in psql, and the corresponding settings are:
autovacuum on
autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor 0.1
autovacuum_analyze_threshold 50
autovacuum_freeze_max_age 200000000
autovacuum_max_workers 3
autovacuum_naptime 1min
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay 20ms
autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit -1
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor 0.2
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold 50
track_counts on
any ideas why autovacuum ignores some of the tables?
thanks,
gabor
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aritz Dávila | 2011-06-23 07:24:12 | Remote connection issues |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-06-23 03:26:18 | Re: data compression in protocol? |