Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind
Date: 2011-04-24 18:41:37
Message-ID: BANLkTin8gg542dH+pegubTqqsSAuJnEayw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> My implementation path for that would be to add a crash_number onto
> pg_control and pg_index. Any index marked as "unlogged, persistent"
> would only be usable if it's crash number is the same as current
> system crash number.
>
> REINDEX would update the index crash number to current value. That
> also allows us to imagine a "repair index" command in the future as
> well.

This seems useful for non-crash-safe indexes in general.

> Heap blocks would be zeroed if they were found to be damaged, following a crash.
>

How do you propose to detect that? Until we solve the whole checksum
story I don't think we have a reliable way to detect bad pages. And in
some cases where do detect them we would detect them by crashing.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-24 19:40:25 Re: windows consolidated cleanup
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-24 17:47:34 Re: windows consolidated cleanup