From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] DOCS: SGML identifier may not exceed 44 characters |
Date: | 2011-06-01 01:05:39 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTin7MB4dVn3YUFnZ5viP0_EHcARgwQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 1 June 2011 06:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> It looks like the original DocBook distribution has a limit of 44, but
> someone patched it to 256 on your installation.
>
> But it seems like no one else has seen this problem yet, so it's quite
> suspicious, since surely people have built the documentation in the last
> few months.
>
The relevant value on my machine seems to be:
/usr/share/sgml/docbook/sgml-dtd-4.2/docbook.dcl:81: NAMELEN 44
This file belongs to the Gentoo package app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd
4.2-r2, which is the current stable version for the 4.2 slot.
I would hazard to suggest that nobody else is seeing this problem
because I'm the only one building the docs on Gentoo =)
Still, the 44 character limit does seem to be per the upstream
distribution, and the identifier I patched above is the first one to
violate it. Are there any solid reasons we shouldn't just comply with
it?
Cheers,
BJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-06-01 07:31:36 | Re: [HACKERS] DOCS: SGML identifier may not exceed 44 characters |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-31 21:21:58 | Re: [HACKERS] DOCS: SGML identifier may not exceed 44 characters |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-06-01 01:11:16 | Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-06-01 01:01:55 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6046: select current_date crashes postgres |