Re: [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object
Date: 2011-06-13 17:09:41
Message-ID: BANLkTin6ZQ3Ufj1Z=eqFZhv19Xw2Dg9_ng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> The attached patch is an update revision of security label support
> for shared database objects.

I'm kind of unexcited about this whole idea. Adding a shared catalog
for a feature that's only of interest to a small percentage of our
user population seems unfortunate.

Are there any other possible approaches to this problem?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-13 17:31:47 Re: procpid?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-13 17:07:05 Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix