Re: Hugetables question

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hugetables question
Date: 2011-06-23 14:12:49
Message-ID: BANLkTimv6uR50jK4aNTXCLrH6R3u9aUrPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
> I think conclusion from this test was "Much more important things are to do,
> then 1% benefit" - not "1% is worthless".
>
> I will try today hugepages, with random peeks.

I think the real conclusion here is "Linux will soon do this for us
automatically without us needing to do anything, so pretty soon there
will be no possible benefit at all".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-23 14:18:15 Re: Table Partitioning
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-06-23 13:41:15 Re: fixing PQsetvalue()