From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | crash-safe visibility map, take five |
Date: | 2011-05-06 21:47:23 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTimuLk4RHXSQHEEiYGbxiXp2mh5KCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Another question:
>> To address the problem in
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg02097.php
>> , should we just clear the vm before the log of insert/update/delete?
>> This may reduce the performance, is there another solution?
>
> Yeah, that's a straightforward way to fix it. I don't think the performance
> hit will be too bad. But we need to be careful not to hold locks while doing
> I/O, which might require some rearrangement of the code. We might want to do
> a similar dance that we do in vacuum, and call visibilitymap_pin first, then
> lock and update the heap page, and then set the VM bit while holding the
> lock on the heap page.
Here's an attempt at implementing the necessary gymnastics.
Comments?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
visibility-map-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 28.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-05-06 21:52:33 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-06 21:38:12 | Re: Prefered Types |