From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bubba postgres <bubba(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: General Postgres performance tips when using ARRAY |
Date: | 2011-05-26 02:29:08 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTimiZ8NwxEo5ub_HFAe6wun1K_OagA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:17 PM, bubba postgres
<bubba(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So, what are the gotcha's around manipulating Arrays in stored procs?
> It seems reasonable that an array_cat /etc would cause the creation of a new
> array, but does mutating an existing array also create a copy?
Never, ever, if at all possible, build arrays with array_cat, ||
operator, etc. Try not to work with arrays iteratively. It will be
very slow. You have better options:
1. subquery array constructor:
array_var := array(select bar from foo where ...);
2. array_agg()
select into array_var array_agg(bar) from foo where ...
3. values array constructor:
array_var := array[1, 2, 3];
don't forget, in recent postgres, you can make arrays of composite
types as well, and also nest:
complex_type := array(select row(bar, array(select baz from bat where
..)) from foo);
For expanding arrays prefer unnest() and check out the coming 9.1
foreach feature
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-FOREACH-ARRAY)
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-05-26 02:36:31 | Re: Connecting to Postgres using Windows 7 |
Previous Message | Andy Lurie | 2011-05-26 02:15:57 | OHI to Sponsor PG West 2011 |