| From: | Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: oom_killer |
| Date: | 2011-04-22 16:37:23 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTimi4EsNLjEf4rVvTYsm4UEZSSJFGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the totally no postgres responses with this.
>
> I didn't understand that. What do you mean?
>
> -Kevin
I meant that when starting to talk about kernel commit limits/ etc,
it's not really postgres centric, but you folks are still assisting me
with this. So thanks, some could say take it to Linux kernels, even
though this is killing postgres.
Tory
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-04-22 16:45:25 | Re: oom_killer |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-04-22 16:34:03 | Re: oom_killer |