Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Date: 2011-05-24 20:38:52
Message-ID: BANLkTimSFHsvrFjTRyWS_KTzzy9GsdhrKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> That's an intriguing possibility.  But part of the point of the
>> original feature was to be able to say:
>>
>> \ef somefunc 10
>>
>> ...and end up on line 10 of somefunc, perhaps in response to an error
>> message complaining about that line.  I don't think your proposal
>> would address that.
>
> Well, you'd write
>
> \ef somefunc +10
>
> instead.

But that would not put you on line 10 of the function.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-24 20:42:55 Re: minor patch submission: CREATE CAST ... AS EXPLICIT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-24 20:38:33 Re: Hash Anti Join performance degradation