From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: time table for beta1 |
Date: | 2011-04-04 16:01:32 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTimM4ZkKs6=+_o3=A-PjJs+vDc_YHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> At the risk of getting laughed at, how about, say, ~2 weeks from now?
>
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
>> Plus or minus a couple of days based on people's schedules and which
>> day of the week we'd like the wrap to happen on.
>
> Betas are usually done using the regular release process, which is
> wrap-on-Thursday-release-on-Monday (to accommodate both packagers who
> work weekdays and those who can only spare time on weekends). So we'd
> really be talking about code freeze on the 14th if we want release on
> the 18th. That might be a bit ambitious, but we can always slip it a
> week if unforeseen problems crop up.
The following weekend appears to be Easter, so it'd have to be a 2 week slip.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 16:08:38 | Re: Compiling a static libpq |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-04 16:00:14 | Re: GSoC proposal: Fast GiST index build |