From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Date: | 2011-06-09 17:11:13 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTim4TeKbpYbQWkqasftv=TA39DKBXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> 2011/6/9 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> The only modification by this patch to the core routine is a new
>>> syscache for pg_seclabel system catalog. The SECLABELOID enables to
>>> reference security label of the object using syscache interface.
>>
>> I believe we decided against that previously on the grounds that we
>> don't want to add syscaches that might get really really big. In
>> particular, there could be a LOT of labelled large objects floating
>> around.
>>
> (Sorry, I missed to Cc: pgsql-hackers, so send again)
>
> As long as we use syscache mechanism to hold security label of
> relation or other cached objects, do you think it cause no troubles?
Maybe, but why do we need it?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-09 17:13:27 | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-09 17:09:39 | Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files |