Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Date: 2011-06-24 02:56:30
Message-ID: BANLkTikzwWMSiWkOz07icsntRb0Rp9VBNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 June 2011 03:48, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I have touched next_token() and next_token_expand() a bit more, because
> it seemed to me that they could be simplified further (the bit about
> returning the comma in the token, instead of being a boolean return,
> seemed strange).  Please let me know what you think.

Cool. I didn't like the way it returned the comma either, but I
thought it would be best if I kept the changes in my patch to a
minimum.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-24 02:59:46 Re: pg_upgrade version check improvements and small fixes
Previous Message Dan McGee 2011-06-24 02:45:33 Re: pg_upgrade version check improvements and small fixes