Re: Range Types and extensions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Range Types and extensions
Date: 2011-06-06 17:13:40
Message-ID: BANLkTikpyXzq4pfROgyk1WjpMBO7m4Gccw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/6/6 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:28 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> we can define a step
>>
>> FOREACH x IN RANGE ..... BY ....
>
> That wouldn't need any of the range infrastructure at all -- it would be
> purely syntactic, right?
>

I don't think. For lot of types the specification of a step is
necessary - for date, for float.

Pavel

> Regards,
>        Jeff Davis
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-06-06 17:13:48 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-06 17:04:41 Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table