Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robert(at)logicalchaos(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches
Date: 2011-06-14 01:57:49
Message-ID: BANLkTikohEbmDV5-w-VXrhTMoioj8s7UfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I think we can be a bit more liberal about build patches than things that
> can affect the runtime behaviour.

I agree. I wouldn't go nuts with it, but I don't see any reason to
worry about fixing this case.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-14 01:58:57 Re: pg_trgm: unicode string not working
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-06-14 01:56:13 Re: pgbench cpu overhead (was Re: lazy vxid locks, v1)