From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the visibility map crash-safe. |
Date: | 2011-06-23 13:22:40 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTik_oywk8_oZtB9mkOoh1ChkKFtvVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, it seems I didn't put nearly enough thought into heap_update().
> The fix for the immediate problem looks simple enough - all the code
> has been refactored to use the new API, so the calls can be easily be
> moved into the critical section (see attached). But looking at this a
> little more, I see that heap_update() is many bricks short of a load,
> because there are several places where the buffer can be unlocked and
> relocked, and we don't recheck whether the page is all-visible after
> reacquiring the lock. So I've got some more work to do here.
See what you think of the attached. I *think* this covers all bases.
It's a little more complicated than I would like, but I don't think
fatally so.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
heap-update-vm-fix-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-06-23 19:14:18 | pgsql: Add information schema views role_udt_grants, udt_privileges, us |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-06-23 05:12:24 | pgsql: Add a bit of markup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2011-06-23 13:40:55 | Re: fixing PQsetvalue() |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2011-06-23 12:54:46 | Re: fixing PQsetvalue() |