Re: On-the-fly index tuple deletion vs. hot_standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On-the-fly index tuple deletion vs. hot_standby
Date: 2011-06-16 16:06:29
Message-ID: BANLkTikTFGtH6LcBGi8tQ3zXEa1Ort4c-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I agree with your suggested fix.

Please ignore the previous patch, which was sent in error. Here's the
fix. I'll apply this tomorrow morning if we all still agree.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
bt_recycle_offby1.v1.patch application/octet-stream 900 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-06-16 16:12:19 Re: use less space in xl_xact_commit patch
Previous Message Radoslaw Smogura 2011-06-16 15:58:16 Re: [WIP] [Stream] Preview of pg_type changes