| From: | Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer! |
| Date: | 2011-06-16 05:32:52 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTikSaXgv8z9dGVPy-r3AtFWsaArAbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Wouldn't it be faster/better/easier if Postgres just had its own built
in UUID generator? Last I tested generating a bunch of UUIDs, it was
quite slow (well compared to MS SQL anyway)..
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> writes:
>> Did anyone ever fix the annoying thing where uuid_generate_v4()
>> doesn't work on Windows 64bit?
>
> AFAIR that was an issue with the uuid-ossp library, so it would be a
> matter for that upstream group to deal with.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-16 05:34:58 | Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer! |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-16 05:23:04 | Re: You could be a PostgreSQL Patch Reviewer! |