From: | Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix for Perl 5.14 |
Date: | 2011-04-23 19:58:08 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTikHxTZ919jKA+S=dDdrxFNoQ7Vhnw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/4/23 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
> On 04/23/2011 03:02 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>
>> Perl 5.14.0-RC1 came out a few days ago...
>>
>> There is a minor compile time error due to the API changing a bit:
>> plperl.c:929:3: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
>>
>> This is due to GvCV() no longer returning an lvalue, instead they want
>> us to use the new GvCV_set macro. (see
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/perl-5.14.0-RC1/pod/perldelta.pod#GvCV()_and_GvGP()_are_no_longer_lvalues)
>>
>> Unfortunately that macro is not available on older perls so the
>> attached provides our own macro when GvCV_set is not defined.
>>
>> Tested with 5.14.0-rc1 and 5.12.3.
>>
>> The -head patch applies with fuzz to 9.0. The 8.4 patch applies clean
>> to 8.4 and with fuzz to 8.3 and 8.2.
>
>
> How nice of them not to fix it in ppport.h. I thought this is exactly the
> sort of thing it's for.
It's not so easy to convert
foo = GvCV(bah);
to a
GvCV_set(foo, bar);
with a ppport.h macro automatically.
But yes, the backport GvCV_set => lvalue GvCV should be in ppport.h.
It is not yet
--
Reini Urban
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-04-23 20:03:52 | Re: Extension Packaging |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-23 19:44:13 | Re: Proposed fix for NOTIFY performance degradation |