Re: branching for 9.2devel

From: David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel
Date: 2011-04-25 17:12:36
Message-ID: BANLkTikGQyWEmzBt24JOvCqjzMN9hXQ_oA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
>>> Of course, that all depends on:
>>> 1) pgindent being "work everywhere", "exactly the same"
>>> 2) Discipline of all new published commits being "pgindent clean".
>
>> The problem is that getting it set up isn't yet trivial.   This is
>> all assuming that we fix that.
>
> Yeah, there is not much point in thinking about #2 until we have #1.

Would this be a good GSoC project (or has the deadline passed)?

--
Thanks,

David Blewett

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-04-25 17:12:59 Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-25 17:12:11 Re: make check in contrib