From: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address |
Date: | 2011-06-14 12:06:33 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTikDkFfdP+DdE=+a+kHcPfPHvpDJXA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The attached patch is a preparation to rework implementation of DROP statement
using a common code. That intends to apply get_object_address() to resolve name
of objects to be removed, and eventually minimizes the number of places to put
permission checks.
Its first step is an enhancement of get_object_address; to accept 'missing_ok'
argument to handle cases when IF EXISTS clause is supplied.
If 'missing_ok' was true and the supplied name was not found, the patched
get_object_address() returns an ObjectAddress with InvalidOid as objectId.
If 'missing_ok' was false, its behavior is not changed.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgsql-v9.2-drop-reworks-part-0.1.patch | application/octet-stream | 25.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-14 12:08:22 | Re: pg_trgm: unicode string not working |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-14 12:02:57 | Re: 9.1 beta1 error |