Re: Unix latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
Date: 2011-05-13 15:18:04
Message-ID: BANLkTikB-xpEqeo-KyJvrLg=JC+9EX3RnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm not that thrilled with the "life sign" terminology, but don't
> have a better idea right offhand.

Yeah, that made no sense to me. Can't we just refer to detecting
postmaster death?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-05-13 15:25:40 Re: Unix latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-05-13 15:09:43 Re: Fw: [BUGS] BUG #6011: Some extra messages are output in the event log at PostgreSQL startup