Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: rajibdk <rajib(dot)deka(at)siemens(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby
Date: 2011-04-21 15:08:46
Message-ID: BANLkTik99fyaQpGBOs1kMykUN=u93fTL=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, rajibdk <rajib(dot)deka(at)siemens(dot)com> wrote:
>> What does that database system identifier means? Is it related to DB
>> transactions’ or unique to a version?
>
> Regrettably, it means you didn't follow the documented procedure.
>
> It isn't possible to do it any other way, so those questions are a distraction.

I think they are perfectly good questions. If someone is trying to
understand how our product works, we should encourage that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-04-21 15:16:45 Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-21 15:08:09 Re: Typed table DDL loose ends