From: | Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments |
Date: | 2011-06-10 02:23:38 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTik4d_4HQtLZmuD7CsRj_N5B+1uHDw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Thanks... and sorry for sending it to hackers list... I had not read the bug
reporting guides... nor the release notes... it seems.
Again, thanks.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org> writes:
>> Postgres 9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 give different line of error numbers on
>> functions that raise runtime errors (it seems).
>
> This is not a bug. See the release notes:
>
> Adjust PL/pgSQL's error line numbering code to be consistent
> with other PLs (Pavel Stehule)
>
> Previously, PL/pgSQL would ignore (not count) an empty line at
> the start of the function body. Since this was inconsistent with
> all other languages, the special case was removed.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-10 03:24:36 | Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-10 02:22:13 | Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-06-10 02:27:41 | Re: smallserial / serial2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-10 02:22:13 | Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments |